<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dixau Text Scanner &#8211; Time Saving Scanner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.didigetthingsdone.com/2008/11/18/dixau-text-scanner-time-saving-scanner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.didigetthingsdone.com/2008/11/18/dixau-text-scanner-time-saving-scanner/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:40:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ASHLEY</title>
		<link>http://www.didigetthingsdone.com/2008/11/18/dixau-text-scanner-time-saving-scanner/comment-page-1/#comment-5369</link>
		<dc:creator>ASHLEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.didigetthingsdone.com/?p=683#comment-5369</guid>
		<description>the dixau is not as good as other items in the market,,
a better for less unit is the TopScan text scanner. it can be bought directly from the website :
www.text-scanner.com

i tested both and by far the &quot; topscan text scanner &quot; is better faster and smarter..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the dixau is not as good as other items in the market,,<br />
a better for less unit is the TopScan text scanner. it can be bought directly from the website :<br />
<a href="http://www.text-scanner.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.text-scanner.com</a></p>
<p>i tested both and by far the &#8221; topscan text scanner &#8221; is better faster and smarter..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
